Zero Trust Architecture — Executive Brief
Executive Overview
Why this matters: In a cloud-native, hybrid workforce world, perimeter defenses are obsolete. Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA) replaces "trust because you're inside" with "never trust, always verify." This briefing explains the architecture, strategic rationale, components, implementation pathway, advantages and trade-offs, and a comparative competitiveness analysis using the No Kings concept as an organizational metaphor.
Context and Strategic Rationale
In the modern digital enterprise, perimeter-based security is obsolete. The traditional model — “trust but verify” — assumed that threats originated outside the network and that once inside, entities were trustworthy. That assumption has been invalidated by cloud migration, hybrid work, mobile devices, IoT proliferation, and increasingly sophisticated cyberattacks. Today’s organizations face an adversarial landscape where the boundaries of trust are dynamic, porous, and often invisible.
Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA) replaces this outdated model with a new one: “Never trust, always verify.” Rather than relying on network location or device ownership as a proxy for trust, Zero Trust continuously validates every user, device, and system attempting to access resources — regardless of where they
Comments
Post a Comment